So the town of Berkley wants to remove the Marines from their city. Aren’t these the same Marines that fought for their rights to say this? Also, the town has given a parking spot to one of the groups that protests the Marines. Talk about not allowing free speech. That’s a government imposing their will upon the people of the town. That’s wrong.

I saw these Marines should leave. Then, they surround Berkley with roadblocks and don’t allow anyone in, or out, and see how they like to play by their own rules. Ok, that’s a bit much, but you see the point.

These liberals only want the Marines when they need them. They don’t want them now, because they aren’t being attacked. Why aren’t they being attacked? Because we HAVE Marines.

Mr. Knowledge hates liberals.

Senator Schurmer is advocating that EVERYONE receive a tax rebate, whether they pay income taxes or not. His argument is that even those who do not pay income taxes, pay social security taxes (FICA) and thus, are also entitled to be part of those receiving a rebate.

However, those who only pay into social security will receive their “share” of that money when they retire and start drawing on social security. They do NOT deserve to receive a portion of the income tax WHICH THEY DO NOT PAY.

Secondly, if Senator Schurmer truly feels that even those who only pay social security taxes deserve some help, why doesn’t he present a bill that would obligate EVEN THE CONGRESS to use the same social security system as the rest of us? Then, at least our children might have a realistic chance of actually receiving social security when they retire.

New York seems to thrive on electing senators with long arms when handing out someone else’s hard earned money and alligator arms when it comes to their own.

Today, Hillary Clinton apparently won the Nevada caucus. The headline on Yahoo, in large letters — with a picture of her, read that Hillary has momentum now and Obama needs help.

Today, Gov. Romney apparently won the Republican, Nevada vote. His victory is a little blue line of type beneath her smiling visage. There is no picture of him, no mention of his momentum, nor the fact that HIS opponents might need help to beat him.

Oversight……or intent?

Last night’s vote in Michigan had several surprises for pundits.

First, Governor Romney won a decisive victory…not because people cared about his religion; but, because Michigan is worried about the economy. And, the best candidate is obviously one with successful business experience.

Secondly, the pundits questioned whether McCain’s credentials for commander in chief would carry him past Romney’s skills in business. To the pundit’s surprise, McCain did not win the day. How could the economy trump the fight against terrorism in any voter’s mind?

The answer is actually pretty obvious. None of the pundits, who are mainly liberals, give President Bush and the military credit for making our country and the world safer from terrorism!

However, President Bush’s success can be directly measured by the issues voters are concerned with in this election cycle. If the issue is safety from terrorism, then this administration has not been as successful as hoped. But, if the main issues continue to be economic, or racial, or almost anything else, then it is time for the media to recognize President Bush’s achievements.

Don’t be fooled that no one has congratulated our Commander-in-Chief. The media doesn’t talk about this because they prefer to sensationalize the problems. That makes better copy for them.

What a surprise!

The woman who never cried when her husband humiliated her in front of the entire world has now cried publicly. Why? Oh, it must be that the poor dear is overworked in this campaign, and the big, bad boys are ganging up on her!

Believe that and she’ll tell you more.

I find it incomprehensible that yet again, the Clintons have made buffoons of the American public, albeit only in New Hampshire this time. Do democrats never learn? President Bill was not only responsible for eviscerating the military and the CIA (which they later blamed for intelligence failures), but he managed to turn the Oval Office into a brothel. Hillary, by standing by, enabled Bill to continue his narcissistic ways.

So, if Bill is an adulterer, what does that make Hillary? There are multitudinous sources who claim that Hillary is an overbearing, unfeeling, dictatorial person; but, now, 3 tears have somehow turned her into a human being! And, anyone in the media or public who see through this farce find themselves described as unfeeling and insensitive people.

Time and again, the democrats have proven they have no shame. They want a President of their party and are willing to promote even such depraved people as the Clintons, IF IT MEANS A VICTORY IN NOVEMBER! But, by supporting Hillary who comes with Bill’s legacy of criminal behaviour, they have proven to be a party with values inconsistent with American ideals.

The overriding question is how much the American public will believe and accept.

We have seen that the Clintons have no shame when it comes to getting what they want. They will cheat (Bill’s area of expertise), lie (Whitewater, Vince Foster’s suicide, travelgate) and steal (White House articles they took when they were “dethroned”). And, if it took Hillary’s tears to turn a debacle into a victory, why then, that is what she will do….and did!

Hillary and Bill are simply the absolute worst politicians today, in terms of their goals, values, and past actions. They have only their own, personal glory in mind as they campaign. When they cry, do not look for tears of shame. The tears of shame will be come later from the American public if Hillary is elected and continues her husband’s (and her) Reign of Shame.