Author Archives: themomteam

Candy Crowley, Lieberal Moderator!

Candy Crowley, of CNN, is the moderator for the second Presidential debate tomorrow night.  A moderator is:

mod·er·a·tor

noun

1.

a person or thing that moderates. 2.a person who presides over a panel discussion on radio or television.
BOTH CAMPAIGNS agreed to having a moderator.  BUT, the moderator is NOT supposed to interject herself/himself into the discussion.  The TOWNHALL AUDIENCE is supposed to be the center for questions to the candidates.
Ah, well.  Candy is obviously a Lieberal and, as such, SHE DOESN’T HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES!

Moderator Role Under Scrutiny — Before the Debate

By Mark Halperin | October 14, 2012

Moderator Role Under Scrutiny — Before the Debate

By Mark Halperin | October 14, 2012
MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty Images

MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty Images
CNN anchor Candy Crowley arrives at the White House for a state dinner in honor of South Korean President Lee Myung-bak and his wife Kim Yoon-ok in Washington on Oct. 13, 2011

11:10 p.m. E.T.

In a rare example of political unity, both the Romney and Obama campaigns have expressed concern to the Commission on Presidential Debates about how the moderator of this Tuesday’s town hall has publicly described her role, TIME has learned.

While an early-October memorandum of understanding between the Obama and Romney campaigns suggests that CNN’s Candy Crowley would play a limited role in the Tuesday-night session, Crowley, who is not a party to that agreement, has done a series of interviews on her network in which she has suggested that she will assume a broader set of responsibilities. As Crowley put it last week, “Once the table is kind of set by the town-hall questioner, there is then time for me to say, ‘Hey, wait a second, what about X, Y, Z?’”

Since when does a journalist have the authority to unilaterally change the rules?  When did Candy Crowley become the Supreme Moderator, in charge of determining what the rules actually mean?  Are we back to Clinton’s “depends upon the meaning of ‘is’ ” ?????????

If you watched the VP debate, you witnessed another Lieberal, Joe Biden, who decided HE didn’t have to follow the rules either!  He hectored, interrupted CongressmanPaul Ryan’s answers (82 times), and was consistently in Ryan’s face.   He didn’t even follow the precept of telling the Truth!   The “facts” offered by Joe Biden turned out to be lies.  He didn’t graduate from Law School in the upper ranks.  He DID vote for the war resolutions.  He DID know about security concerns at Benghazi.

Even Martha Raddatz believed herself to be above the rules — she interrupted Paul Ryan 35 times, according to one “counter”.

It’s a mystery why Lieberals believe they can rewrite the rules to suit their perception of reality.  But, then,   President Obama  has rewritten his own personal history to make it more to his liking!  So, what can you expect from Lieberals?  Unfortunately, it’s more of the same — until their perception becomes reality through sheer repetition and voter fatigue.

Candy Crowley plans to organize the next Presidential debate to HER liking.  Candy  is definitely a Lieberal.

 

Remember Obama’s famous 2008 quote?

If you don’t have any big issues, you attack your opponent!

 

And, that is exactly what the Libs are doing.  After all, they can’t praise any of Obama’s record.  Everything to do with Obama’s term of President is dismal:  the economy, the high unemployment, the mess in Benghazi, the Senate who can’t pass a budget, failing green companies that he supported, and on and on, ad nauseum.  So, the media is trying to deal with small issues and unwarranted attacks against Governor Romney and Congressman Ryan.   And, in the process, the liberal media is exposing their aversion to the truth:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/10/12/on-twitter-washington-post-reporter-calls-ryan-law-order-svu-perp-week

Even among true “blue” Libs, it would be difficult to find a majority to agree with this zany Zak character’s opinion of the VP debate and of Ryan, specifically.

And, to credit VP Biden as any sort of elder statesman is just plain crazy.  Biden was a plagarist.  He lied about his Law School career.  He lied about when Obama knew about the terrorist attack in Benghazi.  He doesn’t understand the U.S. economy.  He is just a grin with a body behind it.  (Thank you, Clint).

Remember Obama’s famous 2008 quote?

Then, remember why Obama’s ads are always criticizing Romney and NEVER proposing anything of his own.

Biden, the Class Clown for the Democrats

Other than smirking, giggling up his sleeve, gesticulating in a wild fashion, interrupting both Congressman Ryan and the moderator (who also interrupted Ryan), and, generally, acting like the class clown, what did Biden do in the VP debate?

 

Well, he lied.  What a surprise.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/12/Fact-Check-Top-Ten-Worst-Lies-by-Joe-Biden-in-VP-Debate

 


Print Article Send a Tip

by Joel B. Pollak 12 Oct 2012, 5:28 AM PDT post a comment

Once again, Joe Biden lied his way through a Vice Presidential debate–just as he did in his contest with Sarah Palin in 2008. This time, the media caught a few of Biden’s worst “malarkey” moments–as did his opponent, Paul Ryan, when he could get a word in edgewise.

Here are the top ten worst lies told by Biden during the debate:

10. “With all due respect, that’s a bunch of malarkey….not a single thing he said is accurate.” At the outset of the debate, Biden tried to paint Ryan as a liar–when Biden, in fact, was the one lying. Ryan had pointed out: 1) that the White House had distanced itself from the Cairo embassy’s apologies on 9/11; 2) that Obama had failed to speak up for Iranian protestors in 2009; 3) that the Obama administration called Syria’s dictator a “reformer”; 4) and that the Obama administration is imposing defense cuts and projecting weakness. All of that is true.

9. “The president has met with Bibi [Netanyahu] a dozen times….This is a bunch of stuff.” While they have met several times–not a dozen–that includes a meeting at which Obama made the Israeli prime minister enter the White House through a back entrance, refused to take a picture with him, and left him on his own for dinner. Specifically, Ryan had criticized Obama’s refusal to meet Netanyahu in New York last month, and to tape talk show interviews instead–a clear snub that sent the wrong signal, again, to Israel’s enemies.

8. “Just let the taxes expire like they’re supposed to on those millionaires.” Biden’s “millionaires” are actually households earning more than $250,000 a year, which includes many middle-class families with two earners, and small business owners in particular who report business earnings as personal income. Biden and Obama have repeatedly labeled those earning over $250,000 as “millionaires and billionaires,” distorting the actual impact of their tax plan on the non-millionaires it would hit hardest, who create a vast proportion of small business jobs.

7. “You know, I heard that death panel argument from Sarah Palin. It seems that every vice presidential debate, I hear this kind of stuff about panels.” Biden’s cheap shot against Palin was an attempt to diminish both her and the man sitting across from him. But Palin never talked about “death panels” in her debate with Biden, for the simple reason that Obamacare had not yet been proposed. Nor did Ryan mention “death panels”–he had addressed the undeniable fact that Obamacare proposes a board to impose cost controls.

6. “The congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for.” Biden’s lie about Ryan’s budget was an attempt to dodge responsibility for lax embassy security–and to cover up that the Obama called for new cuts to embassy security just days after the 9/11 attacks. Ryan’s proposal, which called for a 19% overall decrease in non-defense discretionary spending, does not even mention embassy security–the Obama campaign merely made up that number by applying 19% across the board.

5. “No, they are not four years closer to a nuclear weapon.” Biden’s attempt to lie about the glaring reality of the Iranian nuclear program fell flat. Iran is indeed four years closer to a nuclear weapon, and the Obama administration–believing it knew better than its predecessors–tried to reinvent the wheel on talks with Iran, causing frustration to our allies in Europe and the Middle East. Meeting after meeting this year has failed to produce results, and the loophole-filled sanctions, while hurting Iran somewhat, are not stopping its nuclear program.

4. “No religious institution, Catholic or otherwise…has to be a vehicle to get contraception in any insurance policy they provide. That is a fact.” No, it is not a fact–it is the opposite of a fact, and saying “that is a fact” does not make it any less a blatant lie. The Obama administration is forcing religious institutions to provide contraceptive and abortion drugs through their insurance policies. That is the reason several dozen religious institutions are suing the administration to defend their First Amendment freedom of religion.

3. “It came from this man voting to put two wars on a credit card…I was there. I voted against him.” Biden voted for both the Iraq war and the Afghanistan war. He did not vote for George W. Bush’s plan to extend coverage of Medicare to prescription drugs (though he voted for an earlier, similar proposal), nor did he vote for the Bush tax cuts. But he voted for both of the wars he derided last night. To quote Bill Clinton’s speech to the Democratic National Convention: “It takes some brass to attack a guy for doing what you did.”

2. “What we did is we saved $716 billion and put it back — applied it to Medicare.” Biden repeated the lie the Obama administration has been telling since before Obamacare passed in 2010: that cuts to Medicare today were savings that extend the life of the program. They would be–if the same $716 billion wasn’t also being used to pay for Obamacare. As Ryan pointed out in 2010, and again last night, you can’t double-count the same cuts. Taking $716 billion out of Medicare means exactly that–and hurts, not helps, the program’s solvency.

1. “Well, we weren’t told they wanted more security again.” Biden lied through his teeth about the fact that the administration–specifically, the State Department–had been told again and again that security on the ground in Libya, and in Benghazi in particular, was inadequate. The day before, in Congressional hearings on the Libya attacks, former regional security director Eric Nordstrom described his frustration with having those requests turned down by the government bureaucracy: “For me the Taliban is on the inside of the building.

 

Martha Raddatz — the Liberal media’s “hit” man

ABC is struggling to find a moderator for the VP debate because ALL their staffers are Obama supporters.

Their final choice is  Martha Raddatz,  a fervant Obama supporter, who has infinite connections to Obama and a vested interest in his re-election.  Here are a few of Martha’s links to Obama:

1- President Obama attended Martha Raddatz’ wedding.

2-Obama appointed her husband, Julius Genachowski, to head the  Federal Trade Commission.

3- Martha’s husband was a classmate of Obama’s at Harvard.

4- Obama and Genachowski were members of the Harvard Law Review.

These are only a few of the connections between the media and the Democrats’ party network.  This is why the media slants their coverage of the Presidential election consistently to enhance the Democrats’ reputation.  This is why the media’s approval rating is lower than a snake’s belly.

It’s sad that Martha is the “best” that the media can offer to moderate the VP debate.  But, based on the coverage of this election, it is no surprise that none of the networks, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, could find an impartial person to moderate the debate.  And, scary that Martha’s connections to Obama were hidden!

Oh, yes.  Martha Raddatz was NOT chosen for her integrity.  She was chosen to be the Liberal media’s “hit” man.

 

Why does the stock market dictate a vote for Romney?

Does the stock market’s “high” really help you decide whom to vote for?  Well, it should!

With record levels of unemployment, gas prices surging, home prices dropping, more people on food stamps,  the stock market seems to be  a sign of hope.  But,  it isn’t!

The reason for the stock market’s high prices is that it is the only place to invest with any hope of earning a decent return.  And, there are many investors who are stashing their cash in the stock market which means there is very high demand for a limited product.  And, generally,  high demand means higher prices.

So, why are so many people and institutions investing in the stock market?

It is the uncertainly created by the current administration’s policies.  Companies are holding their capital close to the vest because they don’t know what the future will bring in the way of expensive regulations, increased taxes, and government bungling of the economy and foreign policy. Individuals are NOT spending because they are worried about future taxes or the possibility of losing their jobs because the promised “summer of recovery” has NOT happened.

So, why vote for Governor Romney and Representative Ryan?

Governor Romney has been a successful businessman for many, many years.  He understands how to make businesses successful by lowering taxes and reducing regulations. He understands how to get our country working again.   Representative Ryan, too, understands financial matters, having been chairman of the House budget committee.

The stock market cannot tell us what to do, but,  it is a warning sign to us that we need to fix the economy so all areas can flourish.  The high prices on the DOW may make investors happy, but it should make us wary…..wary of an administration that has demolished all other areas of our market place.

We need the economy to thrive in all areas…..and, for that, we need Romney and Ryan!

Obama is proof that: Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely!

Obamaism:  definition:  Obama, a President who “goes around Congress” because he feels he is above the law!

Executive orders which abrogate the law…. Administrative employees who won’t answer Congress’ subpoenas…..Total dereliction of duty in protecting our American ambassadors and their staff……Sibelius campaigning FOR Obama on the taxpayers’ dime…..Obama lying about his gutting Medicare…………………Ignoring Israel, our chief Mid-East ally……….ATTEMPTING TO INTIMIDATE OUR MILITARY INTO NOT VOTING…….

 

Will Obama ever have to answer to these charges of corruption?  So, far, it doesn’t appear he will.  Witness yet another Obamaism:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/02/obama-urges-companies-to-break-federal-law-for-his-reelection

 

Obama Urges Companies to Break Federal Law for His Reelection

For the past several weeks, several defense contractors made it clear they would have to send out layoff notices to thousands of workers due to automatic budget cuts set to take affect in January.The cuts are triggered by the debt ceiling “deal” hatched last year. The layoff notices are required under federal law.Understandably, the Obama Administration was panicked by this. The notices would hit in the last month of his reelection campaign and have a huge impact in the critical swing state of Virginia, home to hoards of defense contractors. What to do? Simple. Ignore the law.

Yesterday, Lockheed Martin, a massive contractor, announced it had reached a “deal” with the White House and would not send out the legally required layoff notices. The Obama Administration had “interpreted” the law and found it would be “inappropriate” to send out the layoff notices. 

More amazingly, the White House promised to pay any fines or penalties that might be leveled against the company for violating federal law. Read that again.

Yes, the White House just told companies to violate federal law and that, if they get in trouble for it, the government, i.e. taxpayers, will cover their fines.

Let’s remember, this federal law requiring the lay-off notices, the WARN Act, was passed in 1988 by a veto-proof Democrat Congress. It went into affect without President Reagan’s signature. It was an urgent matter for Democrats, until, apparently, they didn’t like the consequences of it.

Nothing must interfere with Obama’s reelection. NOT EVEN FEDERAL LAW.

ANOTHER Obama apology?

Obama has bowed down  to every foreign country that he could find….and, in doing so, made the United States appear subservient to foreign dictators.   NOW, he found something else he could “bow down” to:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/09/20/Obama-admin-releases-apology-video-Pakistan

Obama State Dept Releases Apology Video in Pakistan

 

Is it any wonder that America’s influence is at an all time low?

Is it any wonder that Americans believe their children will live in a worse economic climate and a country with less freedom?

Is it any wonder that thoughtful Americans are coalescing around Governor Romney?

A vote for Governor Romney is a vote to restore our country financially, and to restore our standing as a Super Power, AND to restore our Constitutional Freedoms!

A vote for Obama is a vote for…………………..ANOTHER APOLOGY!

 

Media Idiocy

So,  the MidEast is in shambles, thanks to the bitg O’s policies.  Americans have been murdered.  Around the world, Muslims are rioting, crying out for MORE American blood!  The unemployment is STILL over 8.2%…and, that’s not counting those who’ve given up looking for work.  Gas prices are high enough to buy a house with.

 

And, what is the media topic of the day?

Some purported Romney gaffe!  How about THAT for a laugh?

Well, it’s really a national shame that the media is trying to prevent a Romney win in November.    The Fourth Estate is no longer even trying to appear impartial.  They blatantly announce their favorite…..and, expect us to pat them on the back.

The media isa medium for idiocy!

 

In the Navy……whoops………..

Only trouble is…….the Democrats chose the Russian Navy!

And, now,  we know that the Democrats highlighted Turkish fighter jets.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/17/fighter-jets-in-democratic-conventions-military-montage-were-turkish-not-american/

CAN’T THE DEMOCRATS GET ANYTHING RIGHT?

READ KERRY’S CONCLUSION FOR A REAL LAUGH OF THE DAY!

GUESS NOT.  HERE’S THE PROOF:

September 18, 2012
Print This Article

CHARLOTTE, NC – SEPTEMBER 06: United States Navy Admiral John B. Nathman (retired) speaks on stage with military veterans during the final day of the Democratic National Convention at Time Warner Cable Arena on September 6, 2012 in Charlotte, North Carolina. The DNC, which concludes today, nominated U.S. President Barack Obama as the Democratic presidential candidate. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The Democratic Party’s national convention in Charlotte, N.C., may have doubled down on insulting the U.S. military community.

The Democratic National Committee has already apologized for using a photo of four Soviet-era Russian warships in a giant stage backdrop intended to illustrate the party’s support for military personnel and veterans.

That huge image, visible in the Time Warner Cable Arena during speeches by Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry and retired Admiral John B. Nathman, also depicted a synchronized formation of jet aircraft that convention-goers assumed were American fighter planes.

But the F-5 fighter planes in the photo are part of the air force of Turkey, a nation whose government is now jailing journalists and establishing Islam as a state religion.

Brad Woodhouse, a spokesman for the Democratic National Committee, did not respond when the The Daily Caller asked why the convention planners displayed Turkish-flown aircraft alongside Russian warships while seeking support from the American military community.

On Sept. 12, Democrats apologized for using the picture of Soviet-era, Russian-operated ships after the slip up was first reported by the Navy Times. The Navy Times also received a tip that the planes depicted may have been from the Turkish Air Force. (NAVAL EXPERT: Ships shown during Democratic convention tribute to veterans were Russian)

The vessels, with their distinct radars and blue-cross-motif Russian naval flags, occupied the center of the massive backdrop. The aircraft were depicted flying in a seven-plane formation on the upper right.

At least three of the ships in the image were designed and built by the Soviet totalitarian state that killed 20 million of its own citizens. Amid steady pressure from the U.S. military, the Soviet Union collapsed in 1989, marking its defeat in the four-decade Cold War. One of the warships may now be part of the Ukrainian Navy.

The Russian ships and Turkish aircraft were shown during the final night of the Charlotte convention on Sept. 6, shortly before President Barack Obama accepted his party’s nomination to serve a second term.

The image first appeared in the closing minutes of an address by Sen. Kerry.

Obama is “a commander-in-chief who gives our troops the tools and training they need in war,” Kerry said, reinforced by visuals of foreign ships and aircraft operated by foreign-trained military personnel.

Obama….just lyin’ around

So, why would anyone care if the United States President is of good moral character?  I know, many Libs would scoff that that’s an old-fashioned concept.  But, is moral integrity still of any importance in today’s world?  Well, consider these facts.

1-Libya’s president says that the riots in which our ambassador and three others were murdered was PREMEDITATED.

The lie:  Obama, and his cronies, say that the riots were an Islamic reaction to a video which purportedly showed the prophet Mohammed in a poor light.  Unfortunately, the video has been “out” for months.  And, unfortunately, FOX reports that there were no protestors present at the Embassy until the major attack began.

2-Obama claims that Americans are better off thanks to his policies.

The lies:

Unemployment has been above 8%  since his stimulus “worked its magic”.  Ask your friends, family, and neighbors how the stimulus helped them!

Small businesses are afraid of hiring anyone because no one knows what the future taxes nor regulations will be.  See the unemployment rate.

American influence is at an all time low…. so low that the Mid-east is seething with rioters….all insulting America and our flag…and, killing our representatives.

Business are moving their manufacturing overseas in order to be competitive, including GE, the President’s pet corporation.

Gas prices are at an all time high.  How’s that working out for people who commute?

Every poll finds that Americans are pessimistic about the future and believe that their children will have a worse future than they had.

3-Obama claimed he would have a transparent and “above-board” administration.

The lies:The health care bill was passed in secret and without the public even seeing the documents, DESPITE  OBAMA’S PROMISES THAT EVERY BILL WOULD BE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC FOR A NUMBER OF DAYS BEFORE THE VOTE WAS TAKEN.

And, of course, the Congress didn’t read it either before the Democrats, on a partisan basis, passed the bill.  Remember Nancy Pelosi’s famous  comment “we’ll have to pass it so we can find out what’s in it?”

Representative Issa has requested documents about Fast and Furious over and over.  In more than a year, the Justice Department, under Eric Holder, has refused to allow the required access to documents.

4-Obama said he would run a campaign of high integrity.

The lie:  To date, his campaign has accused Governor Romney of being a financial vulture, of causing cancer which killed a woman, of being uncaring about the middle class, of not being skilled enough or experienced enough to be President.  (BTW, former President Clinton said that Romney was a sterling businessman and that, as a former governor, Romney was definitely qualified to be President.)

How can Americans trust a man like Obama who routinely lies and, through either his lack of experience or arrogance, has run our country into a deep recession and two downgrades of our financial rating?  How can Americans trust a man like Obama who refuses to release his college records?  How can Americans trust a man like Obama who wants to make secret deals with Russia….in the future…..when he has more “flexibility” ?

What makes a President trustworthy?  Is it endless golf?  Is it endless basketball games?  Is it endless social outings with Hollywood stars?  Is it more campaign stops than intelligence briefings?

The problem with our current administration is that they are constantly campaigning on a mixture of innuendoes and lies.  And, re-election is their only motive, NOT the welfare of America.  No.  Obama will say anything and do anything to be re-elected…..even if it means he’s just lyin’ around!