Obama tells Congress, “It’s MY ball” !

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/4/obama-unprecedented-recess-appointment/

MORE EVIDENCE OF MALFEASANCE IN OFFICE BELOW POSTING.

President Obama doesn’t feel he needs to follow the Constitution, the laws of the United States,  nor any precedents.  What a surprise!

Never has the true character of a man been more obvious than with Obama as he appoints a  tax cheat and even nominates Biden,  a man who PLAGARIZED, for the Vice Presidency.  Obama has openly admitted he will circumvent Congress when Congress doesn’t do what he, Obama, wants.

Wow! Do we really want a man in office who feels no responsibility to follow the laws he swore to uphold?  Do we truly want a man in the Presidency who continually divides our nation with his harsh critiques of those who disagree with him?

Obama is the poster child for the consequences of voting based on the media’s image and not on research that would have revealed Obama’s inadequacies.  After all, everyone knew, even though the media tried to downplay it, that Obama came into office with no executive experience….no business experience….no managerial experience….no foreign policy experience…..and, no moral fiber.  While he might be a “nice” guy, he is not a stand-up guy as Lieberals often say.  Instead,  he has repeatedly thwarted the laws of our country.  He rammed Obamascare through, even when polls proved that Americans did NOT want it.  He has refused to enforce our immigration laws.  He challenges states that do NOT  “obey” HIS opinions.  He calls the Tea Party names while he endorses the Occupy bunch knowing that the Occupy bunch has had numerous run-ins with the police while the Tea Party was law-abiding.  He showed his racist tendencies when he blamed the police for how they treated a professor — oh, yes, the professor was black — and then, recanted on his promise to “make nice” with the police.  He shows his favoritism when he plays class warfare games and incites division by his use of untruths…all in order to be re-elected.

Obama is not only arrogant, irresponsible, condescending, AND spending our tax money like it grew on trees, but he is destroying our country and our system of laws!

In short, you had better do exactly what Obama says or he will do whatever it takes, legal or not, to get his way.  If you don’t “play ball” with Obama, he’ll tell you the same as he told Congress on recess appointments……”It’s MY ball and, if you don’t follow MY rules, I’m taking it home!”

http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?postid=273766

Unprecedented “Recess” Appointment Contradicts Obama Justice Department

Posted by Brendan Buck on January 04, 2012 President Obama today made an unprecedented “recess” appointment even though the Senate is not in recess – “a sharp departure from a long-standing precedent that has limited the President to recess appointments only when the Senate is in a recess of 10 days or longer,” according to Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

It turns out that the action not only contradicts long-standing practice, but also the view of the administration itself. In 2010, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal explained to the Supreme Court the Obama administration’s view that recess appointments are only permissible when Congress is in recess for more than three days. Here’s the exchange with Chief Justice John Roberts:

 

Andrew Mitchell — racist

http://www.breitbart.tv/nbcs-andrea-mitchell-iowa-too-white-to-reelect-obama/

Andrea Mitchell reports that Iowans will NOT re-elect Obama because he is black.

It would be interesting to hear how she knows this?  Did she ask everyone in Iowa?  Can she predict the future?  The answer is probably “no” to both questions.  So, why would she say that?  Well, the reason is that Andrea Mitchel is a racist!  Why?   RACISM is making assumptions about people based, NOT on what the people say or do or even truly think, but based upon YOUR OWN PERCEPTIONS OF WHAT THAT PERSON IS SAYING, DOING, OR THINKING.  So, when Andrea says that Iowans will NOT support Obama for a second term, she is assuming the non-support — if that non-support actually exists —  is due to Obama’s skin color, and NOT based on his destroying our economy, our status in the world, or because he insists on placing onerous tax burdens on Americans.

Her refusal to attribute lack of support for Obama assumes that others are racists when, actually, their vote for someone else is more likely based on the poor economy, the unemployment, the increased danger from Iran, etc..  Her “analysis” is absolutely racist and, to the detriment of our country and even the profession of journalism, all too prevalent in our “experts” in TVland.

If she truly wanted to know why people are voting a certain way, she should go out and ask a majority of Iowans.  Her job is to report facts, not her own personal opinions which are based on her own misconceptions, not facts.

Until then, Andrea Mitchell is typical of so many in our television and cable media.  She is a racist!

President Obama — accessory?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70943.html

President Obama and his attorney general, Eric Holder,continually attempt  to thwart the immigration laws of the United States.  Unfortunately, Obama is interested only in the votes that the Hispanic community will bring him, not the welfare of the USA.

But, now his blatant efforts to subvert our country’s immigration laws has hit a new low.  While his efforts to give illegals more rights than even citizens enjoy, he  has now decided to form a hotline for these same illegals in the hopes that they can avoid facing the penalties for their illegal presence in our country and, in the future, gain Obama more votes.

This is not only an obvious political ploy, it is also illegal.  Because, after all, anyone who knowingly aids a felon or felonious act becomes an accessory and faces the same legal penalties.

All law-abiding Americans should tell president Obama to follow the laws he swore to uphold, including the laws against illegal aliens even when it might benefit a vote-hungry President.

 

 

Pelosi…not paying her fair share?

While President Obama Arrives in Hawaii Amidst Security and Fanfare, Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Slips Quietly into Big Island Resort

 

Has anyone ever wondered if legislators are paid too much?  Well, here’s a representative who is paid WAY too much and can throw money away.  Oh, yes, Pelosi has a LOT of spare cash if she can spend $10,000 per night just to stay in a hotel in Haiwaii.

And, ANYONE who can afford to pay $10,000 per night for a hotel room had better not complain to me or anyone else about “those who aren’t paying their fair share.”

 

A New Teapot Dome Scandal?

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/he_schu_in_XaoXJibNNI16jjroHK7aUM

President Obama has appointed Senator Schumer’s brother-in-law to a judgeship in New Jersey.  Really?  Is a relative of an influential United States Senator the only choice?  Will the media even take notice and comment on the inappropriateness or even insidiousness of appointing yet another of the inner circle to a position of authority?  No.  CBS, NBC, MSNBC are all trying to stay within Obama’s inner circle, so they’ll say nothing, or laud the choice.  That’s obvious.

It certainly sounds to me as though Obama wants to have his buddies in every level of authority he can.  There was Rahm, a political crony from Shytown.  Geither, another buddy, who couldn’t remember or didn’t know how to file his taxes, was slotted for Treasury.  Holder, another buddy, now runs the Department of Justice.  And, these are just the most prominent friends of Obama appointed to influential positions of government and working very hard for Obama’s agenda, not the benefit of the USA.

Shouldn’t government appointees, especially a judge,  be impartial?  Shouldn’t even the APPEARANCE of any appointment be impartial or does this approach another Teapot Dome Scandal?  It surely sounds like it.  All I know is that I’m warming up the tea kettle, in case we need some hot water to clean the scum created by  Obama and his cronies.

Until the media starts honestly reporting on President Obama’s scandalous behaviour, anyone for tea?

Matt Damon — Political expert or political junkie?

http://www.gossipcop.com/matt-damon-obama-elle-magazine-one-term-president-balls/

The media seems to love telling us what Hollywood “experts” think about everything under the sun, including their political comments.  I have never understood this fascination with what famous, more often infamous, people want us to believe.   As someone who believes President Obama is the worst possible president we could have elected because Obama had absolutely no skill set, no experience, and even no belief in our Constitution, it really doesn’t change my opinions when Matt Damon tells us “his” views.

It is far more important to do our own research online than to fixate on a wannabe expert like Damon.  And, that research had better include a multitude of sources because the cable media has a love affair with President Obama and hardly ever discuss any fact that goes contrary to his image. CNN, MSNBC and even ABC are NOT in the business of reporting factual news, their goal is to influence the next election so that Lieberalism wins again.  That is why the networks concentrate on glamorizing Obama and insulting all conservatives and conservative viewpoints.

It’s time to start thinking for ourselves. Don’t let a pretty face convince you that that “face” knows what is best for the USA.  Because, that “face” is just that….a face.  Maybe it’s time to put our own face on the issues again.  We need to rely upon our own opinions, not those from an over-paid, arrogant actor from Hollywood.

After all, do you really care what Matt Damon thinks?  Do you really care if Matt Damon has flip-flopped from loving Obama to insulting Obama?   It’s time to replace the ignorant Lieberals with some good old American common sense and return to the strength that an informed electorate gives our country.

Don’t rely on someone like Matt Damon because he is obviously not a political expert.  He’s just a talking head, and little more than a political junkie who happens to be well known.

 

 

 

Merry Christmas!

Or, not, depending on what your governmental job is.

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/congressmen-cant-say-merry-christmas-mail/261466

In a country with a majority of its citizens identifying themselves as “Christian”, and, on a holiday that is based on the birth of Christ, certain Congressman are prevented from wishing their constituents Merry Christmas in any official mailings.

How does this equate with President Obama “celebrating” Muslim holidays or Jewish holidays?  The only difference is that Christians are an easy target because we turn the other cheek as Jesus instructed us.

So, Political Correctness be damned.  Merry Christmas to Everyone.  And, remember that Jesus is the Light of the World.

And, the Light was for all Time…

And, the Love was for All Men.

 

Is there Intelligent Life in Wisconsin’s GAB?

The Wisconsin Government Accountability Board, GAB,  has said it will accept any name on the recall petitions IF there is a valid address and date.   The bureaucrats have decided that it is not their job to make sure that ONLY LEGAL RESIDENTS sign the petitions.  So, Adolph Hitler will be accepted as a signature unless he uses his address in Germany!

Isn’t the GAB supposed to protect us from fraud?  And, if a fake name on a recall petition isn’t thrown out, then fraud has occurred.

There already are too many bureaucrats regulating our lives and businesses and now, we have bureaucrats being paid for NOT doing their job!  If the GAB feels it can’t be responsible for checking whether a signature is valid or not, let’s find someone who will.  After all, there are many unemployed Wisconsin residents looking for work.  They would welcome a job and would probably do it well, and for less, than the current GAB bureaucrats.

It’s criminal that the Government Accountability Board is cheating the Wisconsin electorate and not even living up to the most important word in its name… “accountability”.

 

Lying around by the Media

Why does the media continue to allow President Obama to continuously lie about what Republicans have done?  Why does the media allow him to continue lying about what he previously said and what he says now.  Why does the media allow him to flip flop on issues and to avoid contentious issues by blaming someone else?

How many times can Obama blame “rich” Americans for not paying their share and the media fails to point out the obvious:  what Obama calls a millionaire is, for the most part, a small business person earning about $250,000? And, the spending programs Obama promotes are putting America into the poor house.

How many times is Obama allowed to blame Republicans for the unemployment problem when, in fact, the Republican House has sent over 18 bills to the Senate and Harry Reid is the one who refuses to allow them to come up for a vote?

How many times will the media not take Obama to task for yet another vacation, another golf game, or another game of hoops or traveling under the guise of “business” when, in fact, he is not doing his job as President and, so very obviously vacationing and campaigning on the taxpayer’s dollar?

The media accepts Obama’s lack of dedication to the Presidency because they themselves don’t want to do their job which is to check out what anyone in public office says or does or spends.  Oh, yes, the media is the perfect sidekick to Obama.

The media is a bunch of lazy, opinionated, susceptible, and often belligerant, bunch of ne’er-do-wells that do way too much “lying around”, in every sense of the words.  No wonder they get along so well with President Obama!

 

Republicans? What’s not to like?

While the run-of-the-mill media continues to insult, denigrate, mock, and, generally, act like Lieberal fools when discussing the Republican candidates for President, voters should be asking themselves, “What’s not to like about the Republican candidates for President?”

The Democrats have no choice of candidate because only President Obama is running for the Democrat’s nomination.  He has, unfortunately, proven to be as inexperienced, contrary, aloof, and incompetent as many of us feared he would be.  It would be difficult, if not impossible, to name one program that he has initiated or backed that has helped our fellow Americans find a job or that decreased the National Debt.  The Stimulus was such a failure that few Democrats will even let the word pass their lips.  And, then, there is Solyndra….not only expected to fail, but it did;  and, now, there are charges of insider bias AND those employees are going to receive compensation for the failure of their company.  And, guess who is paying for their tab?

Compared to Obama, almost anyone would be better as President.  Fortunately, the Republicans have chosen a few good men, and one good woman.  Let’s consider the wide range of choices that voters have on this side of the ticket.

Romney — a proven businessman;  a very good, former Governor;  a very moral guy;  a true family man;  and, while he has changed his mind on some issues, isn’t that all part of maturing and understand new and different circumstances?  So, a plus in terms of voters’ choice.

Cain — a proven businessman;  a very decent man;  a man with a sense of humor who isn’t afraid to laugh at his own mistakes;  a family man;  another very good choice.

Gingrich — former Speaker of the House;  very informed on a variety of issues;  and one with the ability to understand historical precedents…good choice.

Bachman — Representative from Minnesota;  extremely focused on conservative issues;  well-spoken;  a woman whose time should come soon, if not now…good choice.

Paul — Representative for ever; conservative in his soul;  true to the conservative viewpoint…good choice.

Perry — Governor of a very successful state in economic terms;  principled;  extremely focused on returning America to the people, not the politicians;  his mistakes…who doesn’t make some mistakes?  All in all…..another very good choice.

There are other candidates running, but you get the idea. Critics see the variety of candidates as proof that the electorate doesn’t back one or the other.  Those critics are wrong.  Actually, the Republicans are presenting a wealth of riches for the voter in terms of choices with  the wide number of candidates.

So, I repeat.  What’s not to like about the Republican slate of candidates?