Tag Archives: Presidential Debate

Romney wins, Michelle applauds

Leave a reply

So, if you read this title, it appears that Michelle Obama was applauding that Romney won the second debate, too!

If so, you would be 50% correct.

Romney did win.  Michelle did applaud.

But, Michelle applauded when Candy  Crowley  inserted herself into the debate with a demonstrably false comment which supported the President.

Michelle Obama Broke Agreed Upon Rules, Clapped At Debate

And, even though Candy did her level best to lie FOR the President, she had to recant her statement before the night was out:

Moderator: Romney was ‘right in the main’ on Benghazi, but ‘picked the wrong word’

Whatever word Romney chose, it was NOT Candy’s responsibility to correct him.

Of course, she was desperate to help the President by interrupting Governor Romney 28 times, by one count, and giving the President 9% more time than Governor Romney. In the three debates, the purportedly unbiased moderators gave the President 44 minutes to Romney’s 40 minutes.

Even so, Governor Romney was a clear winner with his precise and informative answers and with his counter arguments to pretty much everything the President threw at him, including the tired, old, political slurs that the Democrats hope will muddy up Governor Romney’s image.

According to the polls, the hackneyed smear campaigns by the Democrats are not stopping people from seeing and liking Governor Romney.

Applause, please. Michelle, that’s your cue!

Candy Crowley, Lieberal Moderator!

Leave a reply

Candy Crowley, of CNN, is the moderator for the second Presidential debate tomorrow night.  A moderator is:

mod·er·a·tor

noun

1.

a person or thing that moderates. 2.a person who presides over a panel discussion on radio or television.
BOTH CAMPAIGNS agreed to having a moderator.  BUT, the moderator is NOT supposed to interject herself/himself into the discussion.  The TOWNHALL AUDIENCE is supposed to be the center for questions to the candidates.
Ah, well.  Candy is obviously a Lieberal and, as such, SHE DOESN’T HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES!

Moderator Role Under Scrutiny — Before the Debate

By Mark Halperin | October 14, 2012

Moderator Role Under Scrutiny — Before the Debate

By Mark Halperin | October 14, 2012
MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty Images

MANDEL NGAN / AFP / Getty Images
CNN anchor Candy Crowley arrives at the White House for a state dinner in honor of South Korean President Lee Myung-bak and his wife Kim Yoon-ok in Washington on Oct. 13, 2011

11:10 p.m. E.T.

In a rare example of political unity, both the Romney and Obama campaigns have expressed concern to the Commission on Presidential Debates about how the moderator of this Tuesday’s town hall has publicly described her role, TIME has learned.

While an early-October memorandum of understanding between the Obama and Romney campaigns suggests that CNN’s Candy Crowley would play a limited role in the Tuesday-night session, Crowley, who is not a party to that agreement, has done a series of interviews on her network in which she has suggested that she will assume a broader set of responsibilities. As Crowley put it last week, “Once the table is kind of set by the town-hall questioner, there is then time for me to say, ‘Hey, wait a second, what about X, Y, Z?’”

Since when does a journalist have the authority to unilaterally change the rules?  When did Candy Crowley become the Supreme Moderator, in charge of determining what the rules actually mean?  Are we back to Clinton’s “depends upon the meaning of ‘is’ ” ?????????

If you watched the VP debate, you witnessed another Lieberal, Joe Biden, who decided HE didn’t have to follow the rules either!  He hectored, interrupted CongressmanPaul Ryan’s answers (82 times), and was consistently in Ryan’s face.   He didn’t even follow the precept of telling the Truth!   The “facts” offered by Joe Biden turned out to be lies.  He didn’t graduate from Law School in the upper ranks.  He DID vote for the war resolutions.  He DID know about security concerns at Benghazi.

Even Martha Raddatz believed herself to be above the rules — she interrupted Paul Ryan 35 times, according to one “counter”.

It’s a mystery why Lieberals believe they can rewrite the rules to suit their perception of reality.  But, then,   President Obama  has rewritten his own personal history to make it more to his liking!  So, what can you expect from Lieberals?  Unfortunately, it’s more of the same — until their perception becomes reality through sheer repetition and voter fatigue.

Candy Crowley plans to organize the next Presidential debate to HER liking.  Candy  is definitely a Lieberal.